API integration
API integration is the connection between two software systems that lets them exchange data and trigger actions automatically, without a person copying information from one to the other. One system calls the other’s API—a defined set of operations the second system exposes—and the two stay in step.
Use the LLM your team prefers. Start free with MCP and CLI—without a separate SDK for every service.
Mechanics
Which operation, which fields, which values.
Proving the caller is allowed to make it.
And returns a response.
Did it work, and what came back? Step four is where most integrations quietly go wrong.
Methods
| Method | What it is and where it fits |
|---|---|
| REST | Operations over standard HTTP verbs, usually JSON. The dominant style for modern web APIs. |
| Webhooks | The other system calls you when something happens. Event notifications without polling. |
| Polling | Repeatedly asking whether anything changed. Fallback when no webhook exists. |
| Batch / file transfer | Scheduled bulk exchange. Older enterprise systems, large data volumes. |
| iPaaS platforms | Hosted middleware with prebuilt connectors. Business-team-owned integrations. |
Examples
A new customer record in the CRM creates a corresponding customer in billing, so invoices go to the right entity.
An incoming ticket triggers a check of the account’s support coverage before it is routed.
Campaign engagement flows into the warehouse nightly so reporting reflects one version of the truth.
Yesterday’s transactions are pulled from both sides and differences are flagged.
Each of these is straightforward described in a sentence and full of edge cases in practice—which fields map to which, what happens when one side rejects the record, and what happens when the same operation runs twice.
The difficulty
Getting a token is easy. Refreshing and rotating it, and keeping it out of places it should not be, is ongoing work.
APIs change. Fields get renamed, requirements get added, behaviour shifts. An integration built against last year’s contract fails against this year’s, often silently.
A 200 response with an error in the body is a failure that most integrations record as a win. Reading the status code alone is not enough.
If the same request runs twice—a retry, a timeout, a re-run—does the receiving system perform the action twice? Without idempotency, it usually does.
Agents
Traditional integration is written once by a developer who reads the docs, tests against a sandbox, and ships a fixed set of calls. Every request the system will ever make was reviewed by a person.
An AI agent constructs the call at runtime, from a model’s output. The call was not reviewed—it is assembled from what the model inferred about the API, which may be out of date or simply wrong.
The consequence is immediate. An agent acting on a workflow can create, charge, or delete before anyone reads a log.
Older APIs make it much worse. Legacy vendor APIs carry years of overlapping versions, specs that do not match actual behaviour, and sequences nobody documented. A model has no reliable way to know which path your workflow needs.
That is the gap Swytchcode fills: supplying the agent with the correct path for the workflow, then governing execution with authentication, retries, idempotency, validation, and audit.
FAQ